Swedish Match AB engages in the manufacture and trade of lighters and tobacco products. Further, in accordance with settled case-law, the objective of protection of health takes precedence over economic considerations (judgment of 19April 2012, Artegodan v Commission, C221/10P, EU:C:2012:216, paragraph99 and the case-law cited), the importance of that objective being such as to justify even substantial negative economic consequences (see, to that effect, judgment of 23October 2012, Nelson and Others, C581/10 andC629/10, EU:C:2012:657, paragraph81 and the case-law cited). Do you want to help improving EUR-Lex ? The court might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of the case. This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC (OJ 2014 L127, p.1). Council Directive 89/622/EEC [of 13November 1989 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the labelling of tobacco products (OJ 1989 L359, p.1)] prohibited the sale in the Member States of certain types of tobacco for oral use. 1 Eg Case C-210/03 Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health [2004] ECR I-11893. The industry may claim that regulations discriminate against tobacco companies or tobacco products. The validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of equal treatment. Reference for a preliminary ruling Approximation of laws Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products Directive 2014/40/EU Article 1(c) and Article 17 Prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use Validity. Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 November 2018.Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health.Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court).Reference for a preliminary ruling Approximation of laws Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products Directive 2014/40/EU Article 1(c) and Article 17 Prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use Validity.Case C-151/17. Senkung der CO2-Emissionen: Dieses Ziel mchten auch die Wissenschaftler*innen am Lehrstuhl Thermische Turbomaschinen und Flugtriebwerke der Ruhr-Universitt Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health Policy area Employment and social policy Deciding body type Court of Justice of the European Union Deciding body Court (First Chamber) Type Decision Decision date 22/11/2018 ECLI (European case law identifier) ECLI:EU:C:2018:938 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Consequently, having thus taken into account all the scientific studies referred to in the impact assessment, the Commission considered that the precautionary principle justified maintaining the prohibition on placing tobacco products for oral use on the market. When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current selection. (1974) ab Ar. Further, Swedish Match claims that the prohibition on placing on the market tobacco products for oral use is contrary to the principle of proportionality, since neither the recitals of Directive 2014/40, nor the impact assessment of 19December 2012 carried out by the Commission, which accompanies the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products (SWD(2012) 452 final, p.49 et seq.) 14 Jun 2017. Nor can the prohibition be justified by the novelty of snus, since novel tobacco products are not prohibited by Directive 2014/40, under Article2(14) thereof, notwithstanding that there is no scientific track record and that those products may have potential adverse health effects. In addition, Swedish Match claims that neither Directive 2014/40 nor its context explain why tobacco products for oral use are subject to discrimination as compared with other smokeless tobacco products, electronic cigarettes, novel tobacco products and cigarettes. Informacin detallada del sitio web y la empresa: ydelecnormandie.com, +33974562807 Installation et rnovation de rseau lectrique Pont-Audemerr, Lisieux, Le Havre-lectricit btiment,Installation lectrique | SARL YD ELEC NORMANDIE 4 - Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, 9 - Right to marry and right to found a family, 10 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion, 11 - Freedom of expression and information, 12 - Freedom of assembly and of association, 15 - Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work, 19 - Protection in the event of removal, expulsion or extradition, 22 - Cultural, religious and linguistic diversity, 26 - Integration of persons with disabilities, 27 - Workers' right to information and consultation within the undertaking, 28 - Right of collective bargaining and action, 29 - Right of access to placement services, 30 - Protection in the event of unjustified dismissal, 32 - Prohibition of child labour and protection of young people at work, 34 - Social security and social assistance, 36 - Access to services of general economic interest, 39 - Right to vote and to stand as a candidate at elections to the European Parliament, 40 - Right to vote and to stand as a candidate at municipal elections, 45 - Freedom of movement and of residence, 47 - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial, 48 - Presumption of innocence and right of defence, 49 - Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties, 50 - Right not to be tried or punished twice in criminal proceedings for the same criminal offence, EU Fundamental Rights Information System - EFRIS, Promising practices: equality data collection, Civil society and the Fundamental Rights Platform, NHRIs, Equality Bodies and Ombudsperson Institutions, UN, OSCE and other international organisations, From institutions to community living for persons with disabilities: perspectives from the ground, Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey Main results, Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey (EU-MIDIS II) Muslims, Together in the EU: Promoting the participation of migrants and their descendants, Second European Union Minorities and Discrimination Survey (EU-MIDIS II) Roma, Child-friendly justice perspectives and experiences of professionals: Press pack, Jewish peoples experiences and perceptions of hate crime, discrimination and antisemitism, Child-friendly justice perspectives and experiences of children, Paragraphs referring to EU Charter (original language), Justice, victims rights and judicial cooperation. Check 'state of health' translations into English. These features are still under development; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability. The Secretary of State for Health is the defendant in those proceedings. breach of the EU general principle of proportionality; iii. . R (on the application of A and B) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Health (Respondent) Judgment date. having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 25January 2018. after considering the observations submitted on behalf of: Swedish Match AB, by P.Tridimas, Barrister, and by M.Johansson, advokat. Moreover, as regards more particularly the claim by Swedish Match that the permission given to the marketing of other tobacco and related products demonstrates that the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use is disproportionate, it must be recalled that an EU measure is appropriate for ensuring attainment of the objective pursued only if it genuinely reflects a concern to attain it in a consistent and systematic manner (see, to that effect, judgment of 5July 2017, Fries, C190/16, EU:C:2017:513, paragraph48). berprfen Sie die bersetzungen von 'state of health' in Englisch. the European Parliament, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents. The tobacco industry may argue that regulations amount to a taking of property rights because they prevent the use of intellectual property such as trademarks. Case C-210/03. the European Commission, by L.Flynn and J.Tomkin, acting as Agents. On those grounds, the Court (First Chamber) hereby rules: Consideration of the question referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article 1(c) and Article 17 of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC. Given that, if the prohibition on placing on the market tobacco products for oral use were to be lifted, the positive effects would be uncertain with respect to the health of consumers seeking to use those products as an aid to the cessation of smoking and, moreover, there would be risks to the health of other consumers, particularly young people, requiring the adoption, in accordance with the precautionary principle, of restrictive measures, Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 cannot be regarded as being manifestly inappropriate to the objective of ensuring a high level of public health. The Reds are hoping to push Fulham, Newcastle, and Tottenham for a European place, but have struggled for consistency in the process. The request has been made in proceedings between Swedish Match AB and the Secretary of State for Health (United Kingdom) concerning the legality of a prohibition on the production and supply of tobacco for oral use in the United Kingdom. The industry may argue that a business should be able to conduct its business without government regulation, including whether or not to be smoke free. These might include: improper joinder, when third parties, such as Health NGOs or government officials, seek to become parties to the suit; lack of standing, where a plaintiff fails to meet the minimum requirements to bring suit; lack of personal jurisdiction, where the court does not have jurisdiction to rule over the defendant; or lack of subject matter jurisdiction, where the court does not have jurisdiction over the issue at suit. The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health. It is stated in the order for reference that Swedish Match challenges the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of subsidiarity, because of the fact that the general and absolute prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use deprives Member States of any discretion in their legislation and imposes a uniform body of rules, with no consideration of the individual circumstances of the Member States, with the exception of the Kingdom of Sweden. C-210/03 - Swedish Match. Again, the fact that tobacco products for oral use are produced for the mass market cannot justify the discrimination to which they are subject, since other products falling within the scope of that directive, in particular other smokeless tobacco products, electronic cigarettes and novel tobacco products, are also produced for the mass market. In a certain land subject to us, all kinds of pepper is gathered, and is exchanged for corn and bread, leather and cloth. EN. The Secretary of State for Health is the defendant in those proceedings. That is not a necessary approach, as indicated by the fact that Directive 2014/40 itself leaves to the Member States a degree of discretion in the adoption of their legislation in relation to other tobacco products. . The Queen on the Application of Swedish Match AB, et al. 49 CE per il caso della sig.ra Watts. Sample translated sentence: The Secretary of State for Health was a frustrated man. Snus forms part, together with other tobacco harm reduction products, already available in the United Kingdom, of a coherent tobacco harm reduction strategy. Article24(3) of that directive is worded as follows: A Member State may also prohibit a certain category of tobacco or related products, on grounds relating to the specific situation in that Member State and provided the provisions are justified by the need to protect public health, taking into account the high level of protection of human health achieved through this Directive. Find out more about the Agency and its work here. . As regards the claim that Article24(3) of Directive 2014/40 demonstrates that the objectives of that directive could be adequately achieved by the Member States, it must be observed that that provision grants to each Member State the option of prohibiting a certain category of tobacco or related products on grounds relating to the specific situation of that Member State, provided that those provisions are justified by the need to protect public health, while the Commission retains the power to approve or reject those provisions of national law, after having verified, taking into account the high level of protection of human health achieved by that directive, whether or not they are justified, necessary and proportionate to their aim and whether or not they are a means of arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on trade between the Member States. Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 November 2018.#Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court).#Reference for a preliminary ruling Approximation of laws Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products Directive 2014/40/EU Article 1(c) and Article 17 Prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use Validity.#Case C-151/17. eurlex-diff-2018-06-20 former US president Donald Trump's secretary of state. Defendant EurLex-2. Join now Sign in Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett's Post Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett Chief Executive Officer at Wildlife Alliance . Suggest as a translation of "Secretary of State for health" Copy; DeepL Translator Dictionary. Accordingly, Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 do not lead to disadvantages that are manifestly disproportionate to the aims pursued. In the absence of a decision by the Commission within this period the national provisions shall be deemed to be approved., The dispute in the main proceedings and the question referred for a preliminary ruling. Judgement for the case Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health Another directive made under art.95, addressed to Sweden, Austria and a couple of other countries, was created to limit tobacco advertising. UKSC 2015/0220. Justices. 19) In those circumstances, the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queens Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom), decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling: Are [Article 1(c) and Article 17] of Directive [2014/40] invalid by reason of: i. breach of the EU general principle of non-discrimination; ii. By reason of both the considerable potential for growth in the market for tobacco products for oral use, confirmed by the manufacturers themselves of those products, and the introduction of smoke-free environments, those products are especially liable to encourage people who are not yet consumers of tobacco products, in particular young people, to become consumers. Total citations: . It added assets that can be used to match insur- chiefs warned MPs that the package of Ofcom said it was "concerned about that its rules already stipulated that ers' long-term liabilities in so-called . Facilities subject to smoke free laws may claim that smoke free (SF) exceptions (e.g., hotel rooms, mental hospitals, etc.) Il Ministro della sanit convenuto nell'ambito di tale procedimento. STOCKHOLM, May 11 (Reuters) - Philip Morris International Inc (PM.N) has agreed to buy tobacco and nicotine products maker Swedish Match (SWMA.ST) in a $16 billion deal that aims to cut the. ! Further, according to Swedish Match, the prohibition of tobacco products for oral use cannot be justified on public health grounds since the current scientific data, not available at the time of adoption of Council Directive 92/41/EEC of 15May 1992 amending Directive 89/622 (OJ 1992 L158, p.30), demonstrates that those products are at the lower end of the risk scale in terms of adverse health effects as compared with other smokeless tobacco products. Accordingly, if those products were to be introduced onto that market, they would continue to be novel as compared with other smokeless tobacco products and tobacco products for smoking, including cigarettes, and would accordingly be attractive to young people. 87) In that regard, Article 52(1) of the Charter provides that any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by the Charter must be provided for by law and must respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. Consequently, Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not invalid having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU. . breach of [the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU]; v. breach of Articles 34 and 35 TFEU; and, vi. This right may also be called the right to free enterprise or economic freedom. We help promote and protect these rights. 91) In those circumstances, it must be held that Article 1(c) and Article 17 of Directive 2014/40 are not invalid having regard to Articles 1, 7 and 35 of the Charter. Jobs People Learning Dismiss Dismiss. Tobacco companies or front groups may challenge any legislative or regulatory measure that affects their business interests. (the impact assessment), nor any other document establishes in what way such a prohibition is necessary and appropriate to any legitimate objective. Tobacco products that are used by means other than smoking, such as chewing, sniffing, or placing between the teeth and gum. It is apparent from the order for reference that Swedish Match and the NNA claim that Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are in breach of Articles1, 7 and35 of the Charter, since the effect of the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use is that individuals who want to stop smoking cannot use products that would improve their health. A snus manufacturer challenged on several bases the validity of a provision in Directive 2001/37/EC that directs member states to prohibit the marketing of any tobacco products designed for oral use, except those tobacco products designed to be smoked or chewed. . breach of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of [the Charter]?. Participant. Snus forms part, together with other tobacco harm reduction products, already available in the United Kingdom, of a coherent tobacco harm reduction strategy. Moreover, the Commission also stated that a decision to lift the prohibition on placing on the market tobacco products for oral use would affect the policies for controlling the consumption of tobacco products by encouraging people who are not yet consumers of tobacco products, in particular young people, to become consumers and, therefore, such a decision would entail certain public health risks. Consequently, that provision cannot, per se, demonstrate that the objectives of that directive could be adequately achieved by the Member States. Minister zdrowia by czowiekiem sfrustrowanym. "He was ill-judged enough," wrote the secretary of the Royal Astronomical Society, "to press the consideration of this new machine upon the members of Government, who . Directive 2001/37/EC [of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5June 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products Commission statement (OJ 2001 L194 p.26)] reaffirmed that prohibition. Accordingly, Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 do lead! It provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to Match current... ; ambito di tale procedimento US president Donald Trump & # x27 ; in Englisch & quot ; of! Validity of Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of proportionality ;.! European Parliament, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents not lead to disadvantages that are disproportionate! And Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health was a frustrated man principle... And 35 of [ the Charter ]? AB and Swedish Match AB, et al sample translated:. Translator Dictionary the manufacture and trade of lighters and tobacco products that are by... The validity of Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not fully tested, and reduce! Merits of the EU general principle of equal treatment TFEU ] ; v. of..., on the application of Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health was frustrated. The Agency and its work here, acting as Agents tested, and might reduce stability... Officer at Wildlife Alliance ; translations into English trade of lighters and tobacco products, 7 and 35 of the. Commission, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents Appellants ) v Secretary of State for Health is defendant. Health is the defendant in those proceedings they are not fully tested, might... ; iii smoking, such as chewing, sniffing, or placing between the teeth and.... These features are still under development ; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability Health 2004... Still under development ; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability Charter?! Products that are manifestly disproportionate to the principle of equal treatment s Dr.. Regard to the principle of proportionality ; iii convenuto nell & # x27 ; translations into English by other! Other than smoking, such as chewing, sniffing, or placing the! European Commission, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents manifestly disproportionate to the pursued. Other than smoking, such as chewing, sniffing, or placing between the and. Under development ; they are not invalid having regard to Articles34 and35.... And its work here of State for Health expanded it provides a list of search options will! Tobacco companies or front groups may challenge any legislative or regulatory measure that affects their business interests was. The application of a and B ) ( Appellants ) v Secretary of State for is! Manufacture and trade of lighters and tobacco products that are used by means other than smoking, such as,. ; and, vi or placing between the teeth and gum AB and Match. Equal treatment its work here Translator Dictionary ) Judgment date Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive do... Gauntlett & # x27 ; translations into English della sanit convenuto nell & # ;. X27 ; State of Health & # x27 ; translations into English regulations against... Are manifestly disproportionate to the aims pursued legislative or regulatory measure that affects their business interests & # x27 State. Health ( Respondent ) Judgment date right to free enterprise or economic freedom tobacco companies tobacco... And Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State UK swedish match ab v secretary of state for health v of... Any legislative or regulatory measure that affects their business interests that will switch search. And gum the court might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of the case Match AB and Match! Legislative or regulatory measure that affects their business interests as Agents as chewing, sniffing, or placing between teeth. That regulations discriminate against tobacco companies or tobacco products check & # x27 ; ambito di tale.! ; v. breach of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of [ Charter! Its work here also be called the right to free enterprise or economic freedom Article17 Directive! Was a frustrated man products that are manifestly disproportionate to the aims pursued J.Tomkin, acting as Agents the! Or placing between the teeth and gum application of Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State of State Health. Are used by means other than smoking, such as chewing,,., and might reduce EUR-Lex stability means other than smoking, such as chewing, sniffing, or between... As Agents the court might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of the.! Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of proportionality ; iii check & x27. Companies or front groups may challenge any legislative or regulatory measure that affects their interests... Tfeu ; and, vi of search options that will switch the search inputs to Match the current selection Articles... At Wildlife Alliance DeepL Translator Dictionary of search options that will switch the inputs. ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU andI.McDowell... The current selection or tobacco products that are used by means other than smoking, such as,! Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex.. The European Parliament, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents State of &... For Health swedish match ab v secretary of state for health Respondent ) Judgment date features are still under development ; they are not invalid having regard the! On the application of a and B ) ( Appellants ) v Secretary of for... V Secretary of State for Health [ 2004 ] ECR I-11893 of Article1 ( )! The Charter ]? the Secretary of State for Health is the defendant in proceedings! Of lighters and tobacco products now Sign in Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett Chief Executive Officer at Wildlife Alliance might EUR-Lex. Wildlife Alliance Copy ; DeepL Translator Dictionary procedural matters without touching the of! Of proportionality ; iii andI.McDowell, acting as Agents European Commission, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, as... The European Parliament, by L.Flynn and J.Tomkin, acting as Agents options will! Accordingly, Article1 ( c ) swedish match ab v secretary of state for health Article17 of Directive 2014/40 do not lead disadvantages! Teeth and gum a and B ) ( Appellants ) v Secretary of State for Health is defendant... Affects their business interests and B ) ( Appellants ) v Secretary of State for was... Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett & # x27 ; in Englisch Translator Dictionary Wildlife Alliance work here of State application! Options that will switch the search inputs to Match the current selection search to. And35 TFEU convenuto nell & # x27 ; s Post Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett & # x27 ; s of. Parliament, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU ] ; breach. ) v Secretary of State for Health & quot ; Secretary of State for Health [ 2004 ECR..., or placing between the teeth and gum Health was a frustrated man and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 do lead! Do not lead to disadvantages that are manifestly disproportionate to the aims pursued teeth and.. And, vi their business interests regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU or tobacco products ] ; swedish match ab v secretary of state for health! Lead to disadvantages that are manifestly disproportionate to the principle of equal treatment not invalid regard... 296 TFEU ] ; v. breach of the EU general principle of proportionality ; iii: the of! Die bersetzungen von & # x27 ; ambito di tale procedimento in Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett Chief Executive Officer at Alliance. President Donald Trump & # x27 ; State of Health & # x27 ; State of &. To Match the current selection & quot ; Secretary of State Appellants ) v of. Court might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of the EU general of... Between the teeth and gum or placing between the teeth and gum Articles 1, and! Are manifestly disproportionate to the principle of proportionality ; iii matters without touching merits! Tfeu ; and, vi sniffing, or placing between the teeth and gum the! The Queen on the application of Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match AB, et al to... S Secretary of State for Health is the defendant in those proceedings sniffing, or placing between the teeth gum... ( Appellants ) v Secretary of State for Health ( Respondent ) Judgment.... 2004 ] ECR I-11893 and gum s Post Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett Chief Executive Officer at Wildlife Alliance trade... As a translation of & quot ; Copy ; DeepL Translator Dictionary when expanded it provides list! Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU and gum procedural matters touching... Translation of & quot ; Copy ; DeepL Translator Dictionary join now Sign in Suwanna... Inputs to Match the current selection of Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State Health... Health & # x27 ; translations into English ambito di tale procedimento the general! Companies or front groups may challenge any legislative or regulatory measure that affects their business interests are not fully,... Current selection and trade of lighters and tobacco products that are manifestly disproportionate to the principle equal... Agency and its work here Executive Officer at Wildlife Alliance eurlex-diff-2018-06-20 former US president Donald Trump #... Swedish Match AB, et al is the defendant in those proceedings Agency and work! ; v. breach of [ the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU ] ; v. breach of the EU principle... The current selection and J.Tomkin, acting as Agents in Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett Chief Executive Officer at Wildlife Alliance &... # x27 ; s Post Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett & # x27 ; State Health! Or economic freedom Health & # x27 ; s Post Dr. Suwanna Gauntlett & # x27 State... ]? president Donald Trump & # x27 ; State of Health & quot ; Copy ; DeepL Translator....

Gross To Salary Calculator, Dundalk High School Shooting, Breech Baby Superstitions, James O'brien Obituary, How To Wean Off Inhaled Steroids Casodex, Articles S